5 surprising truths about art you’ll never see the same way again

“Oh, I really don’t know anything about this.”
It’s probably one of the most common phrases you’ll hear in contemporary art galleries. That sense of confusion, even a touch of fear toward “high culture” is something many people can relate to. Art can feel like an exclusive club, one that requires a secret code of knowledge about styles, eras, and artists’ biographies.

Here’s the paradox - millions of people visit museums and galleries every year, from the Centre Pompidou to Tate Modern, yet many walk out feeling uncertain, as if they’ve “missed the point.”

But what if it’s much simpler and far more fascinating?
This article reveals a few surprising truths that show that understanding art isn’t about memorizing facts. It’s a captivating journey through ideas, biology, and human psychology. A way of seeing that connects neuroscience, sociology, and philosophy, helping us understand not only the picture on the wall, but also how our minds and the world around us work.

1. Art is a gym for your brain (literally)

Science is now proving what artists and philosophers have long intuited: art isn’t a luxury, it’s a biological necessity.
A new discipline called neuroaesthetics explores how our brains and bodies respond to beauty, form, and ideas. It turns out that art and aesthetically rich environments literally heal us, and make us smarter.

Back in the 1960s, neuroscientist Marian Diamond conducted a revolutionary experiment. She placed rats in three types of environments: an impoverished (empty) cage, a standard one, and an “enriched” one filled with toys, tunnels, and new textures that were changed regularly. After several weeks, she discovered that rats from the enriched environment had a 6% thicker cerebral cortex. It was the first scientific proof that surroundings can physically alter the brain.

A similar experiment was done with humans. In 2019, at Milan Design Week, the project A Space for Being invited visitors to wear special wristbands measuring physiological responses - heart rate, skin temperature, and blood pressure - while spending time in three differently designed rooms. Each had distinct colors, textures, lighting, and scents.

The data revealed that every body reacted differently: the room that calmed one person could stress another. This proved that our response to aesthetics is deeply individual and biological.

But the most astonishing part? Art can actually help you live longer.

"People who attend cultural events once or twice a year have a 14% lower risk of premature death, and those who do it more often reduce that risk by 31%."
— Daisy Fancourt, University College London

So when you look at a painting, listen to music, or spend time in a beautifully designed space, your brain and body respond on a cellular level, even if you’re not aware of it. Art isn’t passive observation, it’s an active process that makes us healthier and more resilient.
But art doesn’t just shape our biology, it also mirrors our social structures, starting with the very concept of ownership.

2. Classical painting was the First Instagram for the Rich

When we look at portraits of aristocrats or landscapes from the 17th–19th centuries, we tend to see them as “windows into the past.” But as art critic John Berger argued, that’s not quite true. Oil painting, which dominated Europe for centuries, was unique in its ability to depict texture, substance, and material wealth. As Berger put it:

“Oil painting did to appearances what capital did to social relations - it reduced everything to the equality of objects.”

Unlike other art forms, oil painting was perfectly suited to displaying ownership. It didn’t reveal something new, it confirmed what its owner already possessed.
A still life showcased fine food.
A portrait flaunted rich fabrics and jewelry.
A landscape exhibited land that belonged to the patron.

A painting was a proof of status - a visual certificate of wealth you could hang on your wall. It presented the world as something to be owned.

Take Thomas Gainsborough’s "Mr and Mrs Andrews" as a perfect example. We see a young couple posing against their vast estate. Their posture, expressions, and relaxed manner speak not of a love of nature, but of possession. They own not only the fields behind them but everything the eye can see - including the painting itself.

So when we look at old paintings, we’re not just seeing portraits or landscapes, we’re seeing a social history of how people wanted to view and display their world, their wealth, and their place in the hierarchy. It was the first visual blog, where wealth replaced likes and heirs replaced followers.
This obsession with possession extended beyond land and objects - it even turned the human body into something to be displayed.

3. Why a naked woman in a painting isn’t just a naked woman

The tradition of depicting the nude body in European art is one of its central themes. But have you ever thought about the difference between being naked and being a nude? John Berger articulated this key idea, and it changes everything.

“To be naked is to be oneself. To be nude is to be seen naked by others and yet not recognized for oneself. A nude body has to be seen as an object in order to become a nude.”

Being naked means being without clothes.
Being a nude is something else entirely - it’s a genre where the body becomes a spectacle. Historically, that spectacle was created for one viewer: the man. The female nude was constructed to flatter the male gaze. She is almost always aware of being watched, and her pose, expression, and gestures are all designed for an imagined observer. Her feelings, thoughts, and desires are irrelevant. She is an object, not a subject.

Compare the expression of a model in an Ingres painting to that of a woman in a men’s magazine - they are strikingly similar. It’s “the expression of a woman responding with calculated charm to a man she imagines but does not know.” She offers her femininity for display.

This idea reframes the history of art - not as a collection of beautiful bodies, but as a story of power, gaze, and how some people became objects for others. It teaches us to ask: Who is looking? For whom was this image made? Whose gaze dominates here?
These questions are just as relevant today - in advertising, film, and media.
Understanding this transforms how we see images of the body - and reveals that the true power of art often lies not in what is depicted, but in the ideas beneath it.

4. Art is an idea, not an object (and that’s why a urinal can be worth millions)

In 1917, artist Marcel Duchamp bought a porcelain urinal from a plumbing store, took it to an art exhibition, signed it “R. Mutt,” and titled it Fountain. The organizers, despite claiming to accept all submission, were outraged and refused to show it. Yet that single act changed art forever.

“Fountain” wasn’t a prank. Duchamp had been developing this idea for years. Earlier, he had attached a bicycle wheel to a stool and exhibited a snow shovel as art. His point was not that he made the object - but that he chose it. By removing it from its usual function and placing it in an art context, he asked a radical question: What makes art, art?
Is it the artist’s manual skill - or their idea?

Fountain became the birth of conceptual art, where the idea takes precedence over the object itself. The focus shifted from how a work was made to what it makes us think about. The original urinal was lost, but today 15 authorized replicas are displayed in top museums worldwide. And when crowds stare at that urinal, they’re not looking at plumbing — they’re looking at an idea that turned the art world upside down.

Because art is an idea, not an object.

Understanding this is key to modern and contemporary art. Such works may seem strange, simple, or even outrageous, but their value lies not in their material or craftsmanship, but in the strength of the idea — in how they challenge our assumptions about what art is.
Yet when art becomes pure concept, a new problem arises: how do you explain its value to someone who only sees the object?
That brings us to the final hidden obstacle to understanding art.

5. Experts are bad at explaining because they suffer from the “Curse of Knowledge”

Why are conversations about art often so complicated and inaccessible?
The problem isn’t you, it’s a cognitive bias called the curse of knowledge. Experts - art historians, curators, critics - know their field so well that they literally can’t imagine what it’s like not to know it. They’ve forgotten what it feels like to be a beginner.

Lee LeFever, author of The Art of Explanation, gives a great example. At a conference, an engineer once asked a CEO, “What is RSS?” The CEO gave a perfectly accurate but overly technical answer full of jargon. The engineer understood nothing, and felt even more confused.
A better answer would’ve been: “It’s like subscribing to websites so you automatically get all their new articles in one place.”
That kind of answer builds a bridge to understanding, instead of a wall of facts.

The same happens in art. When an art historian starts with “This work is a striking example of metamodernist deconstruction of post-structuralist narrative...,” they’re speaking from the curse of knowledge. Like someone tapping a familiar tune that only they can hear, the expert transmits ideas that make sense in their head, but sound like meaningless jargon to everyone else. Instead of explaining, they’re performing their expertise, making art feel even less accessible.

So the problem isn’t that we “don’t understand” art, it’s that it’s often poorly explained. A good expert isn’t the one who knows the most, but the one who can translate their knowledge into language others can grasp.
A good explanation, like good art, builds connection and confidence - not alienation.

Art is a Question, not an Answer

Art isn’t just a collection of masterpieces. It’s a biological workout for the brain, a historical record of power and ownership, an exploration of the gaze that turns the body into an object, and a provocative idea - often obscured by the curse of knowledge.

It doesn’t demand that we have all the right answers. Quite the opposite: its purpose is to make us ask better questions. Art teaches us to look differently - to see power behind beauty, ideas behind objects, and biology behind emotion. Understanding art isn’t a destination, but an ongoing journey - one that makes life richer, more conscious, and, as science shows, even longer.

So the next time you encounter a work that confuses you, don’t ask, “What does it mean?”
Ask, “What does it make me feel and think about?”
And perhaps that answer will surprise you the most.

Like 2